SHIELD? On my TV? Surely you jest.

Love that Steranko cover.I’m about a week late on this one, so I wouldn’t exactly call it “breaking news” anymore, but by now you’ve probably heard that ABC has green-lighted a pilot for a series set in The Avengers film universe, about the day-to-day operations of SHIELD.  And I’ve got say I’m a bit torn…

There are three forces at work here that make me nervous about this latest development in the Marvel Universe (more so than Guardians of the Galaxy, honestly).  They are, in no particular order:

  1. The Superhero TV Show Effect
  2. The Whedon Effect
  3. The Nick Fury Conundrum

We’ll start with the Superhero TV Show Effect.  This is the simple fact that superhero TV shows tend to… well… suck.  Or at least, that supers tend not to translate to the small screen very well.

There was a golden age of superhero television, from 1965 to 1979.  Batman, Wonder Woman, The Incredible Hulk, even the Six Million Dollar Man. Yeah, those classic shows are campy as all get-out, but they were well-received, widely-viewed, and in some cases, pretty much shaped the perception of superheroes in the general public, while beaming them into the home every week (though in the case of Batman, it pretty much fuckered up the popular imagination of an icon. For a taste of this lasting damage, look no further than the post-Keaton, pre-Nolan Batman films…).

More recently, we’ve had entries like Smallville, The Cape, No Ordinary Family, and Heroes.  I’d call Smallville a fluke for its relative success.  I mean, it was pretty much indistinguishable from other WB fare (seriously, one time I thought I was watching Smallville for like ten minutes.  It was actually Felicity.  No joke).  The Cape was actually pretty good—and the closest we’ve had to a real, four-color comic book vibe translated on to the TV in… well, forever.  Unfortunately, no one else seemed to agree that it was as good as I thought it was (except for Abed.  Six seasons and a movie!)  As for the other two, there is no point in extolling their virtues, for they are few.  Suffice it to say, one stars the Commish and the other was a huge disappointment.  I’ll let you work out which is which.  Needless to say, neither moved the needle very much.

I know what you’re thinking. You’re thinking to yourself, “You ignorant, puss-swilling idiot, SHIELD isn’t about supers!  It’s about secret agents!  Secret agent shows almost always work! After shows about lawyers, secret agents are, like, the next most surefire thing you can put on TV.  I hope you die in a fire!”  You would be correct in your assessment.  But I hope you know that words can hurt.  Sticks and stones and all that.

Yes, SHIELD is apparently about secret agents.  So it’s got that going for it.  But it is set squarely in the Marvel Universe, so we know that supers and aliens and magic and Viking space gods are all fair game.   All I’m saying is that I’m a little nervous about the prospect of seeing this realized on the small screen—that maybe just knowing it exists will diminish my enjoyment of movies I love (hell, the Star Wars prequels and the Matrix sequels are excellent examples of that).  I mean, the most amazing thing about the first sequence of the Marvel films is how consistently good they are.  There are basically no missteps—5 perfect films.  I can’t imagine an hour long, weekly sci-fi/thriller is going to be able to live up to that legacy in a meaningful way.  But I really hope I’m wrong.

So next up is the Whedon Effect.  This is the simple, unarguable, and incontrovertible fact that half of everything Joss Whedon makes sucks…

Hey, now!  Put the torches out!  Put the pitchforks down!  Lets talk this out!  What I meant to say is, “There is a large body of Joss Whedon’s work that I have not personally enjoyed, but that is well received by critics and fans, who are totally entitled to their opinions!”

I’ll level—Buffy (and by extension, Angel) sailed by me.  I should’ve liked them.  The themes are right in my happy place.  Buffy had a nubile young Alison Hannigan being all witchy and gay (also square in my happy place).  Hell, I even had more time than ever to actually enjoy TV when it was airing.  But Buffy had two strikes against it out of the gate: firstly, Kristy Swanson will always be the Buffy in my heart; and secondly, the early episodes (and the later episodes as well, I understand) suffered from what would later be called (by me), “The Dawson Effect”—the teenage characters prattling off dialog better suited to some Ryan Gosling rom-dram, or always having a Peter Parker-perfect quip.  This stuff looks good on a page, but on screen it kills me (Looking at you, Chasing Amy.  Sorry Kev). Consequently, the stuff that really put Whedon on the map didn’t spark me, which has always dimmed my perception of his later works—quite unfairly, I admit.

That said, I loved Firefly and Serenity (even if I was a post-cancelation convert) and The Avengers was the best movie of the year (Sorry TDKR, you were number two, except on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays—then you’re my number one).  So really, the Whedon Effect is a bit of a wash.  He’s definitely come a long way since Buffy, but it’s hard to say which way a Whedon-conceptualized SHIELD might shape up.  After The Avengers, I remain cautiously optimistic in that regard.

That brings us to the final issue with a SHIELD television series.  That is the Nick Fury conundrum.  Or the fact that Nick Fury won’t be in the fucking thing.  I mean, this is the movie universe, so Sam Jackson is General Nick Fury, and I’m thinking that he won’t be making many (or any) appearances.  And that bugs me.  I mean, Nick Fury has been rocking missions for SHIELD since Nick Fury, Agent of SHIELD, Marvel’s early foray into psychedelia (not to discount Fury’s prior service to his country, fighting the Germans during the Big One).  His absence will be felt.  And with the passing of Fury’s surrogate and SHIELD’s greatest asset, Agent Phil Coulson, who could possibly offer the continuity between the films and the show? Clark Gregg fucking killed it on The West Wing.  Whedon should’ve kept Coulson alive just for that reason.  Cobie Smulders is a top choice, and with HIMYM seemingly winding to a close, who knows how her availability will change?  Nevertheless, a SHIELD show without so much as a Hasslehoff Fury will have a real hard time keeping my interest…

So lets recap.  Superhero shows are bad (but this is a spy show, Whedon’s TV shows are dubious, and there is no Nick Fury.  I’ve got to confess… I am not too optimistic about what this portends for SHIELD.  That said, I’m a sucker for just about anything Marvel drops these days, so I’m sure I’ll tune in, if grudgingly.  In 2014.

This entry was posted by Man Green.

2 thoughts on “SHIELD? On my TV? Surely you jest.

  1. Super shows are hard to pull off without being campy. The embrace of the camp was what probably helped the 70’s line, and The Cape was attempting to be straight faced with it and almost succeeded, but still fell into the camp ravine and died there.

    You should check out Alphas though. I initially avoided it because A) super hero shows suck like you said, and B) Syfy isn’t exactly known for it’s quality film making. While it occasionally violates it’s own rules, it manages to succeed where Cape failed at being a “serious” supers show. There’s even some fun morality blurring, while they’re working for the government — are they really the good guys in the greater scheme of things?

    I’ve noticed the Whedon effect to some extent as well, though I’m usually more forgiving of his “bad” stuff. And as much as I wanted to like Dollhouse — it just sucked. The concept was there, the execution failed epically.

    As for the SHIELD show itself. The way I’d handle it would be to simply make the show about a cell of the overall organization. Probably one responsible for X, and often complaining about being underfunded because “more important” agents are dealing with the Supers elsewhere. There’s ways around it, Fury only deals with them through e-mail.

  2. I think you’re spot on about “Alphas.” I’ve only seen a little bit, but I have definitely enjoyed it. Likewise, I should’ve mentioned “Misfits,” from across the pond. It’s irreverent, and not exactly about “heroes,” but its good fun, in an “Attack the Block” sorta way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: